The Chinese Frankenstein Virus

A recent article, “The Evidence which Suggests that This Is No Naturally Evolved Virus,” by Sørensen, Dalgleish and Susrud proposes that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was created in a Chinese laboratory using techniques, which are well-documented by the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

One of the key points in this article is the fact that it was widely known that the WIV was working on what the authors call a Chimeravirus. (As a scientific note: The  Chimeravirus is defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service as a hybrid micro-organism that is created by combining fragments from two or more micro-organisms where at least one of the two fragments contain the necessary genes for replication.)

The SARS-CoV-2 was deduced to be a Chinese-made virus because of four main points. Firstly, the part of the virus that attaches to cells or the spike protein is too perfect and must have been engineered in a lab. Secondly, they are six inserts in the virus, which are unique and not found in any other SARS virus in nature. Thirdly, the authors felt that this would be a simple procedure to engineer in a laboratory. Sørensen and his colleagues are more than 90% certain that this cannot happen in nature and had to be engineered in a laboratory. The fourth point is that Sørensen and his scientific team point out many articles that were written both in China and the U.S. demonstrating that Chimeraviruses were being created in a Chinese laboratory. None of this research was hidden – it was out in the open for everyone to read about.

The Chinese were also working on gain-of-function studies. Gain-of-function studies, according to the US Department Health and Human Services, are research projects that involve increasing the capacity of a pathogen to cause illness. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill posted about working with the Chinese to increase gain-of-function.

In 2016, a corona-type virus called SADS was infecting pigs in China. This virus was especially unusual because it infected different cells than previous Coronaviruses; the COVID-19 infection utilizes new tissue-specific binding domain properties from the SADS virus that makes it possible for the virus to use new receptors to attach to human cells in the upper airways.

This scientific study also explores all the problems the WIV had containing viruses at the facility. The theoretical ability to create a monster virus and the probability of escaping from the WIV was explained in detail.

Presently, this research article has been rejected by all major scientific journals on very strange pretenses. The premises of this study have not been argued or  disproved; critics simply have refused to give these researchers the credit they deserve among their peers. China is an extremely powerful economic force in the world and they seem to be able to control any narrative that puts the blame on them for releasing this virus. 

Science Magazine, one of the journals that refused to publish this work, has no problem interviewing a Chinese scientist without asking him any relevant or tough questions. Their interview is littered with easy, softball questions and no real probing about potential Chinese culpability in the initial release of the virus.

The Lancet, another top scientific journal, also refused to publish this study. Paradoxically, the publication did recently release an article detailing a study on the ineffectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine but it was so full of horrible data that they had to print a retraction disavowing the article.

It seems as though scientific ideas and thoughts are stymied today by political considerations.

Not only are science journals conspiring to keep the truth away from the world but social media outlets also censor posts related to Chinese involvement in the COVID-19 pandemic.

It has become impossible to question the man-made origins of the coronavirus and to do so will risk condemnation, or worse it could lead to being ostracized in the scientific community.

China has been very active in clamping down on any research into the origins of the coronavirus. Powerful forces are in play both in Europe and the United States; the National Institutes of Heath (NIH) and Dr. Fauci are directly involved in this amazing cover up.

The scientists who wrote this paper did get their first study published, which dealt with the creation of a vaccine for COVID-19. The second paper that pointed out the high probability of a man-made virus came about because of their initial vaccine research. They felt that if this was a man-made virus  it would totally change the approach to developing an effective vaccine. They had no idea the scientific community and the media would react in such a forceful and negative manner. They were simply publishing their scientific findings in an effort to find solutions to this complex COVID-19 crisis.

It is imperative that the world realizes the Chinese had all the means to create a Frankenstein virus. It’s documented by these scientists, even if nobody will give them a platform to explain what they discovered. The theory that COVID-19 came from a wet market, perpetuated by the media and some politicians, was a ruse used by the Chinese to cover up one of the worst man-made disasters ever. If the world realized China was working vigorously over the last 12 years to develop man-made viruses, it would severely impact the way this rogue nation is perceived in the world. China was warned that their virus research was dangerous in the past to no avail. This may have been an accidental release but why were the Chinese even experimenting with such deadly viral conconctions?

In conclusion, although this virus is very transmittable it is mostly lethal to those over 70 years of age and those with co-morbidities. It’s also responsible for killing more than 600,000 people and causing terrible damage to economies worldwide. If the international scientific and political community doesn’t fully condemn and put a stop to this deadly behavior of the Chinese and their devilish experiments, the world may be hit even harder with the next virus that’s engineered in the Wuhan lab of horrors. 

Columbia University Goes Batty for China’s Coronavirus Response

In the Spring/Summer 2020 edition of Columbia University’s eponymous print magazine, the cover story – What We Have Learned from the Pandemic (So Far) – the Manhattan-based ivy league school strangely touted the fact that its faculty members helped mold China’s response to the coronavirus.

On the third page of the eight-page spread, written by “The Editors of Columbia Magazine” the article states:

In late January, when most Americans were hearing about the novel coronavirus for the first time, the Columbia epidemiologist W. Ian Lipkin was in Beijing, advising the Chinese government on its response … After meeting with health and science ministers, fellow epidemiologists, and physicians working on the front lines, Lipkin delivered a series of recommendations to senior Chinese leaders.

– Columbia Magazine, “What We Have Learned from the Pandemic (So Far),” Spring/Summer 2020 Edition

Lipkin, according to the piece, “endorsed” Chinese efforts to lock down Wuhan and “urged them to close hundreds of live-animal markets like the one at the center of the outbreak.”

Well, well, well.

So, is this piece meant to inform us that Columbia, which by the University’s own admission was involved in early stages of coronavirus response in China, was also involved in the virus’ suppression from the world dialogue until it became a known and feared medical entity in mid-February? By some reports, the virus was first detected in China November 2019. If Columbia was involved from the beginning, why was knowledge of the “novel coronavirus” delayed in reaching global ears until two months after its first instance?

The beginnings of COVID-19 are dark and shadowy; stories run rampant of brave Chinese doctors who had the courage to speak out against the suppression of information and were subsequently arrested or made to “disappear.”

Even The New York Times ran a story about the late Dr. Li Wenliang. In January, he issued a warning about a new virus in an online chatroom to his medical school classmates. Dr. Wenliang would later tragically die of the virus.

The Wall Street Journal echoed China’s serious virus misgivings in a scathing critique of early Chinese response to COVID-19. “China’s errors, dating back to the very first patients, were compounded by political leaders who dragged their feet to inform the public of the risks and to take decisive control measures,” write authors Jeremy Page, Wenxin Fan and Natasha Khan.

We do know that as the virus first spread in China, the Chinese government quarantined the entire city of Wuhan, which has a population of about 11 million people. The quarantine was extreme; people were basically forced into their apartments and prohibited from leaving.

Yet, even as the quarantine kept Wuhan residents isolated, restricted from traveling anywhere in China, there was no such quarantine in place when it came to international travel. Flights from Wuhan to destinations in Europe, the United States and other countries were allowed to continue business as usual during this quarantine in Wuhan. Why would Chinese citizens be protected from the virus’ spread but not the international community? This dichotomous lock-down/not lock-down continued throughout January and February. We all know what happened next …

But the precarious evidence stacking up against China doesn’t end there; it’s widely known that viral research was going on at not one but two Wuhan medical labs. Institutions in the United States such as Harvard University and the University of Texas actively participated in the research at these Wuhan laboratories as did the NIH. And now, by their own admission, we know Columbia University was involved, too.

However, Columbia’s statement in the newly published cover story that the virus originated in the “ wet market” in Wuhan has been widely debunked by American intelligence agencies. Earlier this month, Forbes published a story stating the reasons COVID-19 most likely originated in one of the Wuhan labs.

Why in the world would a prestigious institution like Columbia University disclose in print that they were even involved with this tyrannical Chinese communist government? It must be a case of cognitive dissonance; there’s no other reason to explain why Columbia would be proud of associating its historic reputation with the way the Wuhan virus was handled in China. 

Dr. Fauci

The Insidious Dr. Fauci

Yesterday on CNN, Dr. Fauci was saying that President Trump didn’t listen to him in mid-February about social distancing and had he listened, could’ve saved more lives. An interesting twist of ideas, an easy way out, whatever you want to call this latest line of “insights,” the facts don’t support the fiction.

Dr. Fauci is on tape February 29 saying there is nothing to worry about. When asked if Americans should change their habits – not go to the mall, avoid the gym – Dr. Fauci told Today.com reporters:

“No, right now at this moment there is no need to change anything that you’re doing on a day-by-day basis.”

– Dr. Anthony Fauci, Feb. 29, 2020 on Today.com

Watch the full interview here:

https://www.today.com/video/dr-fauci-on-coronavirus-fears-no-need-to-change-lifestyle-yet-79684677616

But this latest Fauci fabrication is just part of an entire ideology of subterfuge, diverting attention away from his own wrongdoings and false predictions.

Dr. Fauci, while quick to criticize Trump, is also just as quick to defend the World Heath Organization (WHO) when they totally accepted all of China’s bogus data and wildly misleading claims in January and February that there was no human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus or the statistics China offered that seemingly showed low infection rates and mortality rates compared with Western nations.

In addition, China claimed all cases abruptly ceased in March, almost like a magical on-off switch had been toggled and the coronavirus flew away, an insidious bat disappearing into the dark night. Again, not true. But according to Chinese authorities, the curve of the Chinese brand of this virus didn’t flatten; it just dropped off like the precipice of a steep cliff. This chart is the purported trajectory of the virus in China via worldometers.info:

No flattening of the curve here, no gradual lessening. So, is the Chinese reporting of the COVID-19 cases true? Well, we can look elsewhere for corroboration. There is no comparable curve in any other affected country that even remotely looks like this strange graph.

But back to our “Trump could’ve saved more lives” hero in all this, Dr. Fauci, who is oddly quiet about the origin of the virus itself. Why isn’t he demanding a CDC team travel to Wuhan, China and investigate what actually happened there? He certainly can make demands of our own President.

Checking the virology lab in Wuhan, which at one point the National Institutes of Health (NIH) helped fund, is imperative. Dr. Fauci always defends the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) but the statistics that organization produced have been horribly wrong, even when factoring in mitigation and social distancing measures. Dr. Fauci was also originally quiet about the China travel ban but later, in hindsight, praised it. His vocal cords seemed to gain particular strength, however, when announcing the predicted death tolls in America. On March 29, he told CNN’s State of the Union, “I would say between 100,000 and 200,000 deaths” then revised that number to say “it could be more like 60,000” on April 9.

While we don’t know the reason behind the good doctor’s erratic and downright wrong predictions that led to a total and probably catastrophic economic shutdown, there’s one thing we can surmise: He is obviously not to be trusted.

Dr. Fauci referred to the economic shutdown as “inconvenient.” (Although the lack of convenience can’t be applied to him; this lifelong bureaucrat’s income has not been affected.) So, while he collects his paycheck, millions upon millions of Americans will suffer because of the “inconvenient” shutdown. The consequences of putting our economy on halt will be far worse and longer lasting than this virus.

Boris Johnson Hospital Stay

Boris Johnson: Return from the Abyss

The good news was just announced that UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson is on the mend and was released from the hospital after a seven-day stay, which included three days in the intensive care unit.

Upon leaving the hospital, he published a short video message, thanking (by name) a list of doctors and nurses who cared for him, citing them as “the reason in the end my body did start to get enough oxygen.”

Continue reading “Boris Johnson: Return from the Abyss”